Santa Fe, NM (KKOB) – As part of the November 3rd general election, voters around the state will be asked to vote yes or no on four proposed amendments to the state constitution.
Amendment 1 – Ending governor’s pocket veto
If approved, it would require the governor to provide a public explanation for every veto. It also would eliminate the pocket veto, which means that if the governor doesn’t act on a bill within 20 days, that bill would automatically become law rather than automatically die. Opponents argue the requirement would be burdensome and unnecessary.
Amendment 2 – School elections
The second amendment on the ballot would allow school districts to hold bond and mill levy elections during even-numbered general election years. Those elections generally are held during odd-numbered local election cycles.
Those in favor say the change would reduce the need for costly special elections .Critics say school bond elecionts could be overlooked on crowded general election ballots.
Amendment 3 – University Board of Regents changes
Would change how people are chosen to be member for Board of Regents that govern the state’s colleges and universities. If approved, it would create nominating committees to recommend candidates for the boards of regents. The governor would be required to select appointees from candidates recommended by the committees. Currently, the governor has broad authority to select regents, though appointments require confirmation by the state Senate. Supporters say the process could produce more qualified and less political appointments. Critics say it would add another step and limit the governor’s appointment authority.
Amendment 4 – Pay for state legislators
The final amendment on the ballot and the one that has cause most discussion both pro and against would allow state legislators to receive a salary tied to New Mexico’s median household income which means that if approved legislators would receive around $68-thousand dollars a year in salary, still receive the stipend they currently receive as well as the pension. Those opposed say the amount is way to high even when compared with neighboring states. Those in favor say it would allow more people to be interested in running for the legislature.
