Santa Fe, NM (KKOB) — House and Senate Republicans over the weekend voiced their continuing
opposition to the Public Education Department’s (PED) recent rule change that will
effectively eliminate the four-day school week option for districts across the state. This
opposition was expressed in a letter to PED Cabinet Secretary Arsenio Romero that
was signed by every member of the House and Senate Republican Caucuses.
This new rule change, which PED has presented as a mere update to an existing but
unenforced 180-day mandate, has been met with strong criticism from Republican
lawmakers who represent those school districts that will be most negatively impacted by
this new mandate. The letter to the Cabinet Secretary outlined several key concerns,
including stating that PED’s characterization that this new rule change is an update is a
misrepresentation of the facts. “It is disingenuous to suggest that this rule is a simple
update,” said Rep. Gail Armstrong (R-Magdalena). “The previous 180-day mandate has not been enforced since its inception, and the underlying law was repealed 12 years
ago. It is time for the rule to be repealed, not updated,” she stated.
Additionally, while PED claims the four-day school week is not being eliminated, the
reality is that newly set performance targets are so high that no district is likely to meet
the criteria for an exception to the 180-day mandate. This would force four-day districts
to operate for 45 weeks a year, a schedule that is not reasonable in rural New Mexico.
The financial implications of this rule change for four-day districts are also of significant
concern. House and Senate Republicans argued that increased costs for transportation,
food services, and personnel would place undue strain on already tight district budgets.
“PED advises districts that this won’t increase personnel costs, but that is out of touch
with the reality faced by school employees who will see their work year increase by 33
days in some instances,” said State Senator Greg Nibert (R-Roswell). “Our educators
are rightfully expecting to be compensated for their additional time and expenses.”
The proposed mandate is expected to have a detrimental impact on the teacher
workforce, potentially leading to early retirements and the exodus of educators from
rural to urban districts, further exacerbating the inability of the State of New Mexico to
provide educational sufficiency as required by the Martinez Yazzie lawsuit. The change
could also disrupt communities that have built their schedules and lives around the four-
day model.
Lastly, House and Senate Republicans stressed the rule change fails to address the
larger issue of student performance statewide, as it impacts only a very small minority of
Students. “The vast majority of our students, who attend larger districts like
Albuquerque, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Hobbs, Farmington, and Rio Rancho, will not be
affected by this change,” Rep. Armstrong said. She continued, “It is misguided to
believe this rule will lead to any significant improvement in statewide student
performance.”
House and Senate Republicans are calling for a renewed focus on policies that
genuinely promote student success without imposing unreasonable burdens on our
educators and school districts. They urged PED to consider the extensive implications
of this rule change and to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to find more
effective solutions.
